5. The Ruling Class Are Not At War With One Another, They Are At War With Us
Throughout human history, war, and the perceived threat of a mysterious encroaching enemy have skillfully been weaponized by the ruling class against the rest of us. According to the second century writings of the ancient Greek historian Plutarch, for example, the anxiety and fear surrounding possible war with Carthage, one of Rome’s most famous adversaries, was considered a valuable tool by Roman authorities like Publius Scipio Nasica for controlling their own civilian population.
In more modern history, Wall Street financiers connected to Rockefeller interests went so far as to fund both procommunist and anticommunist groups, which translated into tension and anxiety amongst the public. In the case of their anticommunist front, United Americans, they went so far as to sponsor the publication of a Report warning of an impending Communist revolution within the United States that would cause chaos, starvation and “much bloodshed”.
The fearmongering Report, which was featured in the New York Times, claimed two to five million violent radicals received $20,000,000 from the Russian Government to establish a “dictatorship of the proletariat”. As detailed by Professor Antony Sutton , however, behind the scenes this exact same clique of collusive Capitalists were quietly doing business with the Russian Government. Such is the nature of the ruling class.
In the now infamous novel 1984, the luminous writer George Orwell notes that these elaborate illusions of East against West, Left against Right, and so on and so forth, are considered useful by the establishment to “preserve the special mental atmosphere that a hierarchical society needs”. Beyond these captivating theatrics, however, “they are not fighting against one another at all. The war is waged by each ruling group against its own subjects, and the object of the war is… to keep the structure of society intact.”
When we consider how seemingly opposed and competing Governments — from the United States to China, Russia and beyond — along with competing businesses, banks, media outlets, tech companies and so on and so forth, have all aggressively united behind these pseudoscientific lockdowns — despite more than 60,000 medical experts signing a declaration in condemnation of them, as well as early Reports warning of 8% (500,000,000) of the world’s population being pushed into poverty and 130,000,000 being pushed to hunger because of lockdowns — it appears old Orwell was certainly onto something.
Beyond merely preserving the status quo, however, throughout history there have also been percipient personalities that have used conflict, in one format or another, to further expand and centralize their authority and control. Going back to ancient Rome again, Augustas Cesar instigated war with Marc Antony and then used the event to consolidate his power, which culminated in the rise of the Roman Empire.
In more modern history, another reliable example since it is widely recognized without dispute, is the decisive actions that led to the birth of the German Empire. Prior to its ascent, the continental landmass we now recognize as Germany was simply a collection of random States, each with their own separate customs and laws.
This changed with the scheming of Otto von Bismarck, in which he skillfully provoked three major conflicts, using each occasion to further consolidate power, until the German Nation was born and subsequently ruled from one central location and dominated by one central leader.
More extreme examples which have grown in popularity in recent years, are the use of false flag attacks, which are clandestine operations that involve staging an attack on a strategic target, and then using deception, usually through the media, to blame someone else.
In one such example, known as Operation Gladio, a Government sponsored terrorist in Italy — who has since been caught and imprisoned for life for a deadly bomb attack — went on record in a 1992 BBC Timewatch documentary explaining that “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, far removed from the political arena. For one simple reason: to force the Italian public to turn to the state to ask for greater security… so people would willingly trade part of their freedom for security.” Gladio was a massive clandestine operation that stretched across Europe with CIA support.
Unknown to most of the world, variations of this perfidious process have served as the clandestine blueprint from which our global society has warped into what it is today. In the wake of the last global crisis, World War II, for example, the National Security Act was born. This led to the creation of the Department of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the National Security Council, and the infamous Central Intelligence Agency, amongst other remarkably dominant institutions in modern history, all of which gave rise to the American military empire that seems so perennial today, but it was not always so.
Another complimentary creation during this unprecedented consolidation of power was the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the largest military alliance in known history. Other notable centralized authorities that emerged during this time include the United Nations, World Health Organization, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank.
In every instance mentioned, the Rockefeller family and their allies played a significant role. More importantly, however, is that the Rockefellers were intimately involved in the instigation and administration of World War II itself and worked closely with both the U.S. Government and the German Nazi regime, enabling both of their war efforts.
We will revisit this instructive history and how it relates to World Government with credentialed sources and citations momentarily. For now, however, let’s explore how a new kind of war is being waged against the common people to “preserve the special mental atmosphere that a hierarchical society needs” to stay in power.